Lodi Valley News.com

Complete News World

R.7 Million Debt, ‘Strange Contract’ and Lawsuit: Problems at Lexa and Jimmy’s Mansion in SP Apartment Complex |  Sao Paulo

R$2.7 Million Debt, ‘Strange Contract’ and Lawsuit: Problems at Lexa and Jimmy’s Mansion in SP Apartment Complex | Sao Paulo

MC Guimê and Lexa in a photo from November 2016 – Image: Celso Tavares/g1

singers merchandise MCguime that it Lexa They returned to the agenda on Monday (24) after the couple stated on social media that they had not been evicted from a mansion in a condominium in Alphaville, in Greater São Paulo, due to a debt of nearly 3 million Brazilian reais (See more below).

Gimi said he decided to buy the property in 2015 and, without paying attention to the details of the negotiations, signed a “very bad contract.”

Initially, according to the singers, payments were made to the supposed homeowner. However, a new owner would appear, and it was proved that he was the true owner of the manor, and the couple say they proceeded to pay him.

“I began to realize that something was wrong. Just when I thought things were going to be resolved, I was warned about someone else who was considered the legal owner of the house and that I would have to pay him too, urgently, because if not, I would lose the goods and values ​​that I had already provided.” Translation: I was paying for the house to someone who thought he was the sole owner, when, all of a sudden, another owner appeared to me with proof that he said gimme.

Lexa stated that the mansion had previous debts – Image: reproduction / Instagram

restoration process

a g 1 He had access to a restitution that the couple who owned the mansion had filed against Lexa and Jamie.

  • In November 2020, justice was favorable to the owners and decided to repossess the property.
  • At that time, it was religion From ownership of the property to eviction, which occurred in 2021, V.E 2.7 million Brazilian reals.
  • In December 2021, the landlords requested enforcement of the ruling.

The Court of Justice justified this by “negligence [de Guimê] It dates back to at least March 2016. Therefore, it is a long-term occupation, without any compensation,” that is, he would have lived on the property without making payments.

However, Gimme’s defense stated that the amount had already been paid and that would come to light at an “opportune moment”. He also said that the owners are “modern debtors”. The lawyer cites 23 labor claims against the owner-couple that exceed R$5 million.

This Monday (24th), Lexa said the couple had received payment for the property. She said, “Now, they take the house back. The house that was bought, they take it back. Now they want rent for this house and they still complain about the IPTU that they never paid in their life.”

a g 1 He asked for a homeowner’s attorney position, but as of this report’s latest update, had not received a response.