Lodi Valley News.com

Complete News World

Nobel laureate in physics says global warming is a ‘hoax’.

Nobel laureate in physics says global warming is a ‘hoax’.

The Nobel laureate in physics says that global warming is “fun“Organized by entities such as the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and leaders of the Catholic Church. This has sparked the greatest controversy in the scientific community. Now, what is true after all?

Global warming “hoax”

Renowned physicist John F. Clauser, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2022, became the center of controversy when he stated, during a conference promoted by the Faith Deposit Coalition, that “There is no climate crisisDespite his pioneering achievements in light particle experiments in the 1970s, Clauser surprised the scientific community by vehemently denying the scientific consensus on global warming.

Nobel laureates gather for a televised roundtable discussion titled “Nobel Minds” on December 9, 2022. From left to right: Ben S. Bernanke, Douglas W. Diamond, K. Barry Sharpless, Morten Meldahl, Caroline R. Bertozzi, Svante Pääbo, Anton Zeilinger, John F. Clauser, and Alan Aspect. © Nobel Prize Awareness.

The event, attended by Clauser and other speakers, denounced climate change as a hoax orchestrated by “Global gang“, with the participation of entities such as the United Nations, the World Economic Forum and leaders of the Catholic Church. Clauser stated in his speech that global warming is “fun“, challenging the conclusions of most climate experts.

On stage, Clauser presented his theory, asserting that Earth’s temperature is determined primarily by cloud cover, not carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels. According to him, clouds have a clear cooling effect on the planet, negating the existence of a climate crisis.

Controversy in the scientific community

This change of heart for Clauser, who has never published peer-reviewed articles on climate change, has raised concerns among leading climate scientists. Many have expressed concern that his position, backed by his scientific standing, could lead to misleading information about a planetary emergency.

See also  A Guatemalan court temporarily suspends the party of the elected president - Jovem Ban

In response to criticism, Clauser defended his approach, emphasizing that doubt is part of the scientific process. “There was an overwhelming consensus that what I was doing was useless“In the 1970s,” he said in an interview after the conference. “It took 50 years for his work to be recognised,” he explained, highlighting the dynamics of changing opinions over time.

The event, organized by the Deposit of Faith Coalition, a group of more than a dozen Catholic organizations, aims to expose and criticize alleged anti-religious and anti-family agendas related to climate change. Clauser, despite being an atheist, was chosen as the keynote speaker.

Feedback and counterpoints

Experts reacted strongly to Clauser’s claims. Michael Mann, a climate scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, described his arguments as “Pure garbage” that it “PseudoscienceAndrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, confirmed that clouds actually amplify the greenhouse effect, contributing to global warming.

Anton Zeilinger, the Austrian physicist who shared the Nobel Prize with Clauser last year, expressed his respect for Clauser’s scientific accuracy, although he stressed that he is not an expert in climate science.

In 1972, Clauser conducted pioneering experiments on quantum entanglement, a process in which two or more particles are linked in such a way that a change in one leads to a simultaneous change in the other, even if they are separated by large distances. These experiments confirmed the phenomenon that Albert Einstein described as “Scary action at a distance“Moreover, they have paved the way for technologies such as quantum computers, capable of solving problems too complex for classical computers.

See also  Miley's coalition elects President of the Argentine Senate

When Einstein presented his ideas, he was viewed as crazy and strangesaid Zeilinger, professor emeritus of physics at the University of Vienna.This has happened in science when the majority was completely wrong. I don’t know if that’s the case here, but science should remain open to debate.

Clauser, who does not receive funding from oil, gas and coal interests, recently joined the board of the Carbon Dioxide Alliance, a group that claims carbon dioxide is good for the planet. His statements contradict prevailing scientific understanding, and highlight the persistence of climate skepticism in some areas, even in the face of the global consensus on climate change.

By John F. Clauser

Physics laureates Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger at the Nobel Prize ceremony, December 10, 2022. © Nobel Prize Outreach. Photo: Clément Morin.
  • Nobel Prize in Physics 2022
  • Date of birth: December 1, 1942, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Affiliate at time of award: JF Clauser & Assoc., Walnut Creek, California, USA
  • Motivation for the award: “For experiments with entangled photons, proving the violation of Bell’s inequalities and pioneering quantum information science”

a job

One of the most notable features of quantum mechanics is that it allows two or more particles to exist in what is called an entangled state. What happens to one particle in an entangled pair determines what happens to the other particle, even if they are far apart. In 1972, John Clauser conducted pioneering experiments using entangled particles of light, photons. These and other experiments confirm the validity of quantum mechanics and pave the way for quantum computers, quantum networks, and encrypted quantum communications.

AGRONEWS®, informative Washington Post.