Flamengo: STJD denounces Gabigol and Arascaeta for bidding in the Copa del Rey – 09/08/2022

The Prosecutor of the Supreme Court of Sports Justice has reconsidered Atletico’s request and denounced Gabigol and Arrascaeta, from Flamengo, because of entries they were penalized with a yellow card in the first leg of the Copa del Rey. With this, players can be embezzled in the competition.

Gabigol is framed for the assault, under Section 254-a of the Brazilian Sports Justice Code (CBJD). If convicted, he can take anywhere from 4 to 12 matches. On the other hand, Arrascaeta was denounced for violent play, in Article 254, whose penalty kicks range from one to six matches.

In the two bids involved, Flamengo’s players were punished with a yellow card. Gabigol’s kick was on Fernandinho’s wheel, while Arascaeta’s chariot hit Eric. Later, the match referee, Luiz Flavio de Oliveira, was removed by the Brazilian Confederation.

At first, the prosecutor did not condemn the players, but the Parana club insisted on the case. Atlético accurately cited the penalty imposed by the Brazilian Football Confederation and recorded the content of the VAR audios.

The duo’s trial will be on August 16, at the Second Disciplinary Committee. The session will be on the eve of the second leg of the Copa del Rey quarter-final.

The opinion of the attorney general

Gabigol is framed in the article with the most serious penalty. For the prosecutor, Ronaldo Biacenti, who is responsible for reconsidering the news of Atletico’s wrongdoing, hit Flamengo striker Fernandinho with a kick separate from the match dispute. According to the prosecutor’s understanding, Gabigol’s action is deliberate, with no access to the ball.

As for Arrascaeta, the concept is that the complaint of violent entry is justified because it is not necessary to harm the opponent with the chariot. The Uruguayan hit Eric’s leg.

“It is sufficient for the action to take place by the use of force inconsistent with the reasonably expected standard of the method in question or to act recklessly or recklessly in the play dispute, even without intent to harm the adversary,” the prosecutor wrote. .