Lodi Valley News.com

Complete News World

Arnaldo Cesar Coelho issues verdict on controversial Flamengo penalty: ‘It’s childish’

Arnaldo Cesar Coelho issues verdict on controversial Flamengo penalty: ‘It’s childish’

Written by Lance!

In the second half of the match between Flamingo that it ChrysanthemumThe ball was thrown by Rubro Negro fans. On the field which resulted in two balls being left on the field causing a huge mess. After the game, Arnaldo Cesar Coelho He commented on this move and issued his verdict on the controversy surrounding it. penalty marked.

– Nobody disputes that it was a penalty. Now, explaining that the second ball inside the penalty area would not interfere is childish. The play remained in the middle, which gave the referee enough time to stop the match. His inexperience, like the experience of the defenders in kicking the ball against each other.

➡️ What do Flamengo, Fluminense, Botafogo and Vasco have in common? All Rio teams have an unprecedented collection of Kenner sandals. Click here and secure your pair now!

With the score tied, midfielder Barreto, from Criciuma, hit the second ball that was on the pitch and ended up in the goal. Everton Cebollinhafrom Flamingo. Quick, Judge. Magelson Lima Barbosa He scored the penalty kick for Robro Negro, which caused a huge stir among netizens who were very confused by the move.

Moments before Flamengo’s penalty (Image: Reproduction)

After the match, the former referee Oliveira computer He explained the movement and the rule that led the referee to award the penalty kick.

– Every time the player uses a file Goalwho The second ball It is considered an object and is thrown at an opponent, a member of the referee or the match ball, as the case may be. Rule 12 The game must be restarted using direct free kickSo it was inside the area, penaltyThe penalty kick was well executed. Magelson Lima Barbosa – The computer started

See also  Defender Pablo leaves confusion aside and believes in Flamengo's turnaround in the Brazilian Cup | Flamingo

– Many wonder if he shouldn’t. Stop the game…According to the rule, the game only stops when you have The second ball On the field, if that second ball interfere with progress About the game. In this case he did not intervene because there was only intervention from A Pareto’s purposeful work.

– It was work Purposeful to ParetoNote that it is close, but interference occurs from touch From Pareto, which is intended, and it is deliberate act, deliberateMagilson positioned himself there and correctly scored the penalty kick for Flamingo – He finished.

BCD Oliveira is a referee commentator (Image: Reproduction)

➡️ Everything about Mengão now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel Lance! Flamengo

The rule is written on page 102 of the volume. Brazilian Football Confederation Rulebook 2023/2024.

📘Rule 12 – Mistakes and incorrect behavior.

A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits one of the following offences: throws an object at the ball, an opponent or a member of the match officials, or touches the ball with an object.